Why Burp Suite?


I would like to publish this article because of many questions. I'd appreciate it if you'd like it to reach more people. As you know, I'm doing security research on web security. One of the most frequently asked questions is what tool do you use? I want to tell you the results of my experience. There are already automated web security browsers in the sector, such as Acunetix, AppScan and Netsparker. Based on the tests I have done with two different versions of the products. As you know, this kind of automated software can miss things while scanning. It does not always give the right result and these outputs should be examined and analyzed by experts. They also skip some important points because the possibility of manual testing is limited. Therefore, manual safety tests are important. Other than that, these software has meaningless high prices.




The Burp Suite has an automated scanning feature, but even that can give false results. Unlike other automated software software that offers a lot of manual testing Burp Suite tool to get more accurate results in your web application tests, use the person to gain the ability to test manually and just enter the URL address, press the scan button will be the right choice to get away from the logic to get the output. The annual license fee for Burp Suite is $ 400, while the annual license fee for other automated software is around 13 times. As such, there is a serious budget expenditure. By choosing Burp Suite, I think that as an employee you can budget yourself and use it for professional and personal development. The current annual license fee is available here. [https://portswigger.net/pricing] There are two more things to remember. Burp Suite is the software most security researchers use. Manual saws are important in such safety investigations. Burp Suite software is widely used by security researchers. In almost all proof of concept videos, we see that the Burp Suite tool is used in write-ups. I would like to confirm that I have a more correct choice. Another issue is the subject of domestic software which is in the mouth of everyone who does not fall from the agenda. What we call native software means that if X is headquartered in a country, it makes money for that country. Even if it is a domestic product, I think this is wrong even if it is strategically installed in that country. As a result, which country is established will save money there. As a personal opinion, I think that any kind of software called "domestic" is wrong to sell and market.


Of course, I decided to write a text only to answer my questions and my existing experiences. Stay well with my next article.

Bu blogdaki popüler yayınlar

Windows LNK File Analysis in Forensic System Reviews

SQL Injection Payload List